CPU, GPU AND RAM

NVIDIA Tesla M60: LLM inference and server rendering boundaries

In this article
THE QUICK TAKE

M60 is two8GB GPUs, with active240W and passive300W board editions kept distinct.

NVIDIA Tesla M60 is assessed here as an exact Maxwell board configuration. Its published 8 GB capacity is the starting point for a workload qualification, not a measured serving or rendering result.

Exact model and memory variants

M60 contains two independent8 GB GDDR5 GPUs per board, 16 GB in total. The passive300 W and active240 W editions have different cooling and power envelopes.

VariantMemoryPublished board powerCooling / format
M60 passive board8 GB GDDR5 per GPU; 2 GPUs; 16 GB board total300 WPassive; Dual-slot PCIe board; two GPUs
M60 active board8 GB GDDR5 per GPU; 2 GPUs; 16 GB board total240 WActive; Dual-slot PCIe board; two GPUs

Specifications: Official product/support documentation.

LLM backend and memory budget

One GPU starts with 8 GB, not16 GB. Maxwell fails current vLLM requirements. Validate a tiny artifact on a retained CUDA12.x path and map workers to the two physical devices.

The current vLLM requirement is compute capability7.5 or higher; this architecture is below that floor.

Compatibility evidence: llama.cpp CUDA build configuration and the NVIDIA architecture matrix.

Cycles and batch rendering

For Cycles, separately validate devices and a small scene with a compatible backend. Two frame workers do not imply one 16 GB scene memory domain. There are no RTX RT cores; choose denoising by actual compatibility.

Blender 5.2 LTS GPU rendering manual.

Integration into a server or workstation

Identify active versus passive hardware before installation; the fan arrangement changes the host requirements. The vGPU lifecycle documentation is separate from bare-metal CUDA qualification. Keep the board-level300 W/240 W field distinct from per-device observations.

A concrete qualification scenario

A used M60 is advertised as 16 GB. Rewrite the inventory as two 8 GB devices under one physical board, then inspect its cooling edition. Run a tiny control on each GPU using the retained legacy environment. Assign separate reference frames if rendering is evaluated. A larger single-device model cannot be justified from the board total. The useful evidence includes the exact edition, device mapping and independent output validation.

The evidence to retain

Keep an ordinary qualification record with the actual test outputs.

Identify the tested variant, software build and execution mode before entering observations. Leave unavailable measurements explicitly unknown.

The fields below separate published specifications from observed allocation and job completion, so a later operator can repeat the same case.

Evidence fieldWhat this profile must retain
Hardware identityNVIDIA Tesla M60; physical variant and reported device identifier
Memory boundary8 GB published; observed free memory before and after loading
Inference artifactExact weights digest, quantization, context and offload configuration
Render artifactScene digest, renderer version, backend and denoising setting
System envelopeDriver, container/build digest, enclosure and cooling configuration
Completion evidenceApplication exit status, output validity and observed memory failures

The active240 W and passive300 W M60 variants still expose two 8 GB domains; cooling edition does not merge those domains.

Further reading: RAM and VRAM: which memory matters for an AI server?, A GPU inference benchmark you can trust, NVIDIA and AMD GPU catalogue.

← All articles